Editorial team
Editorial Team Who Stands Behind the Numbers
Three named editors. Public profiles. Every page on this site is the work of a person you can look up, hold to account, and correct when we get something wrong.
🕐 Last updated Jul 2026
Anyone can publish a number. The question worth asking of any site like this one is who put it there, and what happens when it turns out to be wrong.
So we sign our work. Every figure on TopSlotsRTP is checked by a named editor, every page carries a byline, and each of the three people below has a public profile setting out what they own, how they verify it, and where their commercial interests lie.
That matters more here than on most slot sites, because our entire product is factual claims — this casino runs that build, at that return, on that date. If those claims aren’t attributable to someone, there’s no reason to believe them.
Editorial direction, hub and category pages, site structure, and compliance review. Jon decides what gets covered, to what depth, and signs off every page before it goes live.
Read profile →
Verification methodology, the relationship between certified and deployed RTP, volatility classification, and the maths behind the five calculators. Mark owns the standards every figure is checked against.
Read profile →
Individual slot pages and the per-casino RTP checks themselves — opening each game at each operator, reading the information panel, and recording what’s actually running.
Read profile →What signing our work commits us to
Figures come from the game, not from other sites. Every deployed RTP we publish is read from the game’s own information panel at a named casino, and carries the date it was taken. Where we show a studio’s certified specification rather than a verified deployed figure, we label it as such.
Commission doesn’t move the numbers. We earn a commission when readers sign up through some of our links — that’s how the site is funded. It has no bearing on the RTP figures we publish, which are what they are regardless of who pays us, and no operator can buy a better position in a ranking built on returns.
Corrections are made openly. When a figure turns out to be wrong or has gone stale, we fix it and note the date on the affected page. Reader corrections are genuinely welcome — the paytable in front of you is more current than anything we publish.
AI-assisted research is disclosed. Where AI tools are used for source consolidation or drafting, that’s set out in full in our editorial policy. Every published claim is independently verifiable and checked by a second editor.
Full standards are documented in our editorial policy. If something on this site looks wrong, tell us — corrections go to the editor who owns the page.